A 38-year-old mentally challenged man cannot be considered a child 
under the Domestic Violence (DV) Act, the Bombay high court ruled on 
Thursday and quashed a lower court's order granting maintenance to the 
man and his mother.
 Justice Roshan Dalvi heard a petition by a 
man to quash and set aside the order of a Solapur magistrate directing 
him to pay his wife and son Rs 5,000 each as maintenance. The 
magistrate's order was passed on a complaint by the wife and son under 
the DV Act. They sought maintenance, saying after 12 years of the birth 
of their child, the husband had neglected them. The husband's appeal 
before the sessions court was dismissed.
 Uday Warunjikar, the husband's advocate, argued that the son was not
 entitled to maintenance under the DV Act as the definition of a 'child'
 under the Act does not include a 38-year-old man, even though he is 
mentally challenged. He said there was no pleading about commission of 
acts of domestic violence after the DV Act came into effect in September
 2005.
 Justice Dalvi allowed the husband's plea but told the 
woman to seek relief before the appropriate court under the appropriate 
law.
Source : TOI , Mumbai ; 21st June 2013
Source : TOI , Mumbai ; 21st June 2013
No comments:
Post a Comment