A 38-year-old mentally challenged man cannot be considered a child
under the Domestic Violence (DV) Act, the Bombay high court ruled on
Thursday and quashed a lower court's order granting maintenance to the
man and his mother.
Justice Roshan Dalvi heard a petition by a
man to quash and set aside the order of a Solapur magistrate directing
him to pay his wife and son Rs 5,000 each as maintenance. The
magistrate's order was passed on a complaint by the wife and son under
the DV Act. They sought maintenance, saying after 12 years of the birth
of their child, the husband had neglected them. The husband's appeal
before the sessions court was dismissed.
Uday Warunjikar, the husband's advocate, argued that the son was not
entitled to maintenance under the DV Act as the definition of a 'child'
under the Act does not include a 38-year-old man, even though he is
mentally challenged. He said there was no pleading about commission of
acts of domestic violence after the DV Act came into effect in September
2005.
Justice Dalvi allowed the husband's plea but told the
woman to seek relief before the appropriate court under the appropriate
law.
Source : TOI , Mumbai ; 21st June 2013
Source : TOI , Mumbai ; 21st June 2013
No comments:
Post a Comment